2024
Cereals
|
Sl. No. |
Crop |
Thematic area |
Technology Demonstrated with detailed treatments |
Area (ha) |
No. of farmers/ demonstration |
Reasons for shortfall in achievement |
|||||||||||
|
Proposed |
Actual |
SC |
ST |
Others |
Total |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
T |
|||||||
|
1. |
Scented rice (cv. Kudrat 3) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of 50% RDN (30 kg N/ha) through inorganic fertiliser + 50% RDN through organic sources [50% N through FYM + 25% through vermi-compost) + 25% through neem oil-cake] in scented rice Code: (23FAG08-K)
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
No |
||
|
2. |
Rice (cv.Kalinga Dhan 1203) |
Varietal evaluation |
Demonstration on medium duration HYV rice (Kalinga Dhan 1203). (Code: 24FAG01-K) |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
|||
|
3 |
Rice |
IDM |
Demonstration on management of Neck Blast Disease of Rice RP-Seed treatment with (Carboxin 37.5% + Thiram 37.5%) @ 2.5 g/kg seed and 2 foliar sprays of Trifloxystrobin 25%+Tebuconazole 50%WG @ 200gm/ha at 15 days interval starting first spray at leaf blast disease appearance |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
No |
||
|
4 |
Maize |
IPM |
Demonstration on integrated management of fall army worm in Maize First Window (seedling to early whorl stage): spray 5% NSKE or Azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 5 ml/l of water Second window (mid whorl to late whorl stage): To manage 2nd and 3rd instar larvae at 10-20% damage spray Spinetoram 11.7% SC @ 0.5 ml/l of water Poison baiting: Poison baiting is recommended for late instar larvae of second window. Keep the mixture of 10 kg rice bran + 2 kg jaggery with 2-3 litres of water for 24 hours to ferment. Add 100g Thiodicarb just half an hour before application in the field. The bait should be applied into the leaf whorl of the plants. Third Window (8 weeks after emergence to tasseling and post tasseling): Hand picking of the larvae is advisable. |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
No |
||
|
5 |
Mango |
IPM |
Demonstration on IPM practice for management of fruit fly in mango Destroy all fallen fruits at weekly intervals, install 06 nos. of Methyl Eugenol Plywood traps /Acre. Plough the soil at the tree basin in frequent intervals. Alternate spraying of Deltamethrin 2.8 EC @ 0.5 ml/lit and Azadirachtin (0.3%) 2 ml/liter in 10 days interval should be done before three weeks of harvest |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
No |
||
|
6 |
Groundnut |
ToT |
Demonstration of usefulness of crop calendar (Groundnut) for improving the technical knowledge of farmers and application of technology FP : Existing print material i.e. text and bulky messages, not season specific and redundant information regarding technology Demo : Providing crop calendar with multi colour pictorial, concise and season specific message, very informative and particular information regarding specific technology for improving the technical know how of farmers |
|
|
12 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
15 |
25 |
30 |
30 |
60 |
|
||
|
7 |
Vegetables/poultry |
Farmer led extension |
Demonstration on transfer of technology through harnessing human values in agriculture F.P: Technology is often transferred through progressive farmers / change agents Demo: Progressive farmers designated by an organization as per the domain of specialization serves as an ambassador of change in the process of technology transfer. (Farmer scientist, farmer professor, farm captain, blue farmer of the district, mushroom lady etc.) Source: IJEE, 2022 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
7 |
12 |
8 |
20 |
|
||
|
8 |
|
Impact assessment |
Impact study on KVK organized training programmes of different durations |
|
|
15 |
8 |
12 |
6 |
53 |
5 |
80 |
20 |
100 |
|
||
Details of farming situation
|
Crop |
Season |
Farming situation (RF/Irrigated) |
Soil type |
Status of soil (Kg/ha) |
Previous crop |
Sowing date |
Harvest date |
Seasonal rainfall (mm) |
No. of rainy days |
||
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|||||||||
|
Scented rice (cv. Kudrat 3) |
Kharif |
Rainfed medium |
Red loam soil |
232.8 |
15.6 |
185.8 |
|
21.06.24 |
10.11.24 |
910.3 |
74 |
|
Rice (cv.Kalinga Dhan 1203) |
Kharif |
Rainfed medium |
Red textured loam soil |
281.1 |
9.7 |
175.3 |
|
26.06.24 |
12.11.24 |
1098.2 |
72 |
In both the Tables, information of same crop should be provided. For example, if in Table 3.2A crops are mentioned as a,b,c,d etc., in the table for Details of farming situation, the same crop
should be mentioned in the identical sequence.
|
Crop |
Thematic Area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) |
% Increase |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
|
Demo |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Scented rice (cv. Kudrat 3) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of 50% RDN (30 kg N/ha) through inorganic fertiliser + 50% RDN through organic sources [50% N through FYM + 25% through vermi-compost) + 25% through neem oil-cake] in scented rice |
10 |
1.0 |
33.5 |
28.2 |
18.8 |
72850 |
111980 |
39130 |
1.54 |
65190 |
94400 |
29210 |
1.45 |
|
Rice (cv.Kalinga Dhan 1203) |
Varietal evaluation |
Demonstration on medium duration HYV rice (Kalinga Dhan 1203). (Code: 24FAG01-K) |
10 |
1.0 |
48.4 |
45.9 |
5.4 |
67500 |
110850 |
43350 |
1.64 |
69800 |
116640 |
46840 |
1.67 |
|
Groundnut |
ToT |
Demonstration of usefulness of crop calendar (Groundnut) for improving the technical knowledge of farmers and application of technology FP : Existing print material i.e. text and bulky messages, not season specific and redundant information regarding technology Demo : Providing crop calendar with multi colour pictorial, concise and season specific message, very informative and particular information regarding specific technology for improving the technical know how of farmers |
60 |
Continue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vegetables/poultry |
Farmer led extension |
Demonstration on transfer of technology through harnessing human values in agriculture F.P: Technology is often transferred through progressive farmers / change agents Demo: Progressive farmers designated by an organization as per the domain of specialization serves as an ambassador of change in the process of technology transfer. (Farmer scientist, farmer professor, farm captain, blue farmer of the district, mushroom lady etc.) Source: IJEE, 2022 |
20 |
Continue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact assessment |
Impact study on KVK organized training programmes of different durations |
100 |
Continue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
200 |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance of FLD
Oilseeds:
Frontline demonstrations on oilseed crops
|
Sl. No. |
Crop |
Thematic area |
Technology Demonstrated with detailed treatments |
Area (ha) |
No. of farmers/ demonstration |
Reasons for shortfall in achievement |
|||||||||
|
Proposed |
Actual |
SC |
ST |
Others |
Total |
||||||||||
|
|
|
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
T |
|||||
|
1 |
Rapeseed (cv.Krishna) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of bioconsortia (Azotobacter, Azospirillum & PSB) at 1:1:1 ratio @ 4kg/ha along with 50-25-25 kg N-P2O5-K2O/ ha in rapeseed (Code:24FAG23-R) |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
5 5 |
5 5 10 |
No |
||||||
|
2 |
Groundnut (cv. Dharani) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application Soil test based fertilisers (STBF)+ lime 0.2 LR + seed inoculation with Biofertlisers (Rhizobium & PSB 20g/kg seed each) Code:[23FAG18(R)] |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
9 0 |
9 0 10 |
No |
||||||
|
3 |
Sunflower (Kaveri champ) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of STBF + Lime 0.2 LR + FYM @ 5t/ha + Sulphur 40kg/ha+Biofertiliser(Azotobacter, Azospirillum and PSB, 1:1:1@ 4.0 kg each/ha) |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
6 4 |
6 4 10 |
No |
||||||
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
20 9 |
20 9 30 |
|
||||||
Details of farming situation
|
Crop |
Season |
Farming situation (RF/Irrigated) |
Soil type |
Status of soil (Kg/ha) |
Previous crop |
Sowing date |
Harvest date |
Seasonal rainfall (mm) |
No. of rainy days |
||
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|||||||||
|
Rapeseed (cv.Krishna) |
Rabi |
Irrigated upland |
Black soil |
276.6 |
9.5 |
177 |
|
24.09.24 |
30.12.24 |
68 |
|
|
Groundnut (cv. Dharani) |
Rabi, 2023-24 |
Irrigated medium land |
Red medium textured loam soil |
283.5 |
10 |
178.2 |
Rice |
20.01.2024 |
28.04.2024 |
32 |
02 |
|
Sunflower (Kaveri champ) |
Rabi, 2023-24 |
Irrigated up land |
Red medium |
232.8 |
15.6 |
185.8 |
Rice |
18.01.2024 |
20.04.2024 |
32 |
02 |
In both the Tables, information of same crop should be provided. For example, if in Table 3.2A crops are mentioned as a,b,c,d etc., in the table for Details of farming situation, the same crop should be mentioned in the identical sequence.
|
Crop |
Thematic Area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) |
% Increase |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
|
Demo |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Rapeseed (cv.Krishna) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of bioconsortia (Azotobacter, Azospirillum & PSB) at 1:1:1 ratio @ 4kg/ha along with 50-25-25 kg N-P2O5-K2O/ ha in rapeseed |
10 |
1.0 |
Cont. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groundnut (cv. Dharani) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application Soil test based fertilisers (STBF)+ lime 0.2 LR + seed inoculation with Biofertlisers (Rhizobium & PSB 20g/kg seed each) |
10 |
1.0 |
21.6 |
18.4 |
17.4 |
78574 |
137792 |
47315 |
1.75 |
71453 |
117307 |
45855 |
1.64 |
|
Sunflower (Kaveri champ) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of STBF + Lime 0.2 LR + FYM @ 5t/ha + Sulphur 40kg/ha+Biofertiliser(Azotobacter, Azospirillum and PSB, 1:1:1@ 4.0 kg each/ha) |
10 |
1.0 |
15.8 |
13.3 |
18.8 |
61865 |
107078 |
45213 |
1.73 |
54100 |
89638 |
35538 |
1.66 |
|
Total |
|
|
30 |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Other crops
|
Crop |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) |
% change in yield |
Other parameters |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demo |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Rice |
IDM |
Demonstration on management of Neck Blast Disease of Rice |
10 |
2 |
38.15 |
32.77 |
16 |
%Disease infestation- 7.48 |
%Disease infestation- 14.75 |
38500 |
57225 |
18725 |
1.48 |
36500 |
49155 |
12655 |
1.34 |
|
Maize |
IPM |
Demonstration on integrated management of fall army worm in Maize |
10 |
2 |
127.2 |
59.8 |
53 |
% pest infestation- 22.1 |
% pest infestation- 82.1 |
50000 |
292560 |
242560 |
5.85 |
43000 |
137540 |
94540 |
3.19 |
|
Mango |
IPM |
Demonstration on IPM practice for management of fruit fly in mango |
05 |
2 |
65.62 |
41.16 |
59 |
No. of flies/ trap/week-130 % of infestation-5.74 |
No. of flies/ trap/week-53 % of infestation-16.66 |
50000 |
262480 |
212480 |
5.25 |
48000 |
164640 |
116640 |
3.43 |
|
|
Total |
25 |
6 |
|
|||||||||||||
Livestock
|
Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No. of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Livestock production and management |
Demonstration on quail farming under semi-intensive system (Demos : 10 nos., 50 birds/Unit)
|
10 |
10 |
Avg 5 week body weight (gms)- Male birds-191.2 gms, Female birds- 217.3 gms, Egg production in 9 weeks -900 nos/unit
|
– |
100% |
– |
– |
1120/- |
3000/- |
1880/- |
2.67 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
|
Poultry (Chicken) |
|
Demonstration of Moringa and other feed supplementation on growth performance of backyard poultry (Demos.: 10, 15 birds/unit) |
10 |
10 |
Avg 16 week body weight of Colour broiler 1.97kg |
Avg 16 week body weight of Colour broiler 1.81kg |
8.84% |
Mortality 0% |
Mortality 13.3% |
2097/- |
5910/-/- |
3813/- |
2.8 |
2001/- |
4706/- |
2705/- |
2.35 |
|
Poultry (Turkey) |
|
Demonstration of turkey farming for sustainable livelihood(Demo-6 , 5 birds/Unit) |
6 |
6 |
Avg 28 week body weight (Kg)- Male birds-5.58 Kg, Female birds- 3.51 kg, |
|
100% |
– |
– |
5942/- |
10,845/- |
4903/- |
1.8 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Poultry (Chicken) |
|
Demonstration on backyard or low input technology poultry farming breed Vezaguda (Demo – 10, 20 birds/unit) |
10 |
10 |
Continuing.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others (pl.specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No. of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
|||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
|||||||
|
IMC Fingerlings |
Feed Management |
Demonstration of different Probiotics on the growth performance of IMC fingerlings
|
05 |
05 |
Yield (fingerlings no. /ha.) = 97,000 / 2 crops/3 months |
Yield (fingerlings no./ha.) = 41000 / 2 crops / 3 months |
136.58 |
Survivability (%) = 84 |
Survivability (%) = 46 |
82000 |
3,62,000 |
2,80,000 |
4.41 |
48000 |
1,70,000 |
1,22,000 |
3.54 |
|
|
Puntius gonionotus |
Production Management |
Demonstration on Growth of Pangas ( Stripped catfish) in Carp polyculture
|
05 |
05 |
34.6 q/ha. |
19.3 q/ha. |
79.27 |
Wt. of after 6 months (gm) = IMC (360 ) + Pangas (438 ) = 798 gm |
Wt. after 6 months (gm) = Only IMC (350) gm |
100000 |
519000 |
419000 |
5.19 |
90000 |
289500 |
199500 |
3.22 |
|
|
Amur carp |
Production Management |
Demonstration on Replacement of slow-growing mrigal with Amur carp (Genetically improved common carp) in composite carp culture |
05 |
05 |
43.6 q/ha. |
19.8 q/ha. |
120.20 |
Wt. of after 4 months (gm) = 480 gm |
Wt. after 4 months (gm) = 330 gm |
120000 |
654000 |
534000 |
5.45 |
100000 |
297000 |
197000 |
2.97 |
|
|
Others (pl. specify) |
Production Management |
|
Demonstration on biological control of Aquatic weeds
|
05 |
05 |
Result awaited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Fisheries
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Other enterprises
|
Category |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No. of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
*Economics of check (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
|||||
|
Value Addition |
Demonstration on sweet potato and pulse flour fortified noodles |
10 |
10 |
Sensory evaluation
8.1 |
Sensory evaluation
7.2 |
10.8 |
Keeping quality
4months |
Keeping quality
2months |
250 Unit- (10 kg Noodles)
|
680 |
430 |
2.72 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
1.25 |
|
Value Addition |
. Demonstration on value addition in Jackfruit |
10 |
10 |
7.6 |
7.1 |
7.04 |
3months |
1 month |
210 |
1350 |
850 |
2.7 |
210 |
210 |
– |
– |
|
Value Addition |
Demonstration on Value addition of finger millet for enhancing income of SHG |
10 |
10 |
8.1 |
7.2 |
12.5 |
2.5 months |
1 month |
300/unit/5kg |
900/unit/5kg |
600/unit/5kg |
3.0 |
200/unit/5 kg |
400/unit/kg |
200/unit/5 kg |
2 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Women empowerment
|
Category |
Name of technology |
No. of demonstrations |
Observations |
Remarks |
|
|
Demonstration |
Check |
||||
|
Farm Women |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pregnant women |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adolescent Girl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other women |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neonatal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infants |
|
|
|
|
|
Farm implements and machinery
|
Name of the implement |
Crop |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
Area (ha) |
Filed observation (output/man hour) |
% change in major parameter |
Labor reduction (man days) |
Cost reduction (Rs./ha or Rs./Unit) |
|||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Power operated finger millet Thresher |
Finger millet |
Demonstration on power operated finger millet thresher |
10 |
1 ha |
62.5kg/hr |
5.8 kg/hr |
977.58 |
6 labor / ha |
45 labor/Ha |
|
|
3000 |
22500 |
|
|
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Demonstration details on crop hybrids
|
Crop |
Name of the Hybrid |
No. of farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (kg/ha) / major parameter |
Economics (Rs./ha) |
|||||
|
Cereals |
|
|
|
Demo |
Local check |
% change |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
BCR |
|
Maize |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paddy |
Puja |
10 |
2 |
38.15 |
32.77 |
16 |
38500 |
57225 |
18725 |
1.48 |
|
Sorghum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
Cereals
|
Sl. No. |
Crop |
Thematic area |
Technology Demonstrated with detailed treatments |
Area (ha) |
No. of farmers/ demonstration |
Reasons for shortfall in achievement |
|||||||||
|
Proposed |
Actual |
SC |
ST |
Others |
Total |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
T |
|
||||
|
1. |
Scented rice (cv. Kudrat 3) |
Integrated nutrient management |
Application of 50% RDN (30 kg N/ha) through inorganic fertiliser + 50% RDN through organic sources [50% N through FYM + 25% through vermi-compost) + 25% through neem oil-cake] in scented rice |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
8 2 |
8 2 10 |
No |
||||||
|
2. |
Maize (cv.VNR 4224)
|
Integrated weed management |
Post-emergence application of tembotrione 34.4% SC @ 100 ml/ha at 20 DAS (4-5 leaf stage) in maize |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 0 0 0 |
7 3 |
7 3 10 |
|||||||
|
3. |
Brinjal |
Integrated Pest Management |
Seed treatment with Metalaxyl MZ 72% WP @ 2gm/kg + soil application of Carbofuran @ 1kg a.i./ha + soil drenching with Carbendazim @ 0.15% + Streptocycline @ 0.015% at 30 and 45 days after transplanting |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1 0 0 0 |
4 0 |
5 0 5 |
|
||||||
|
4. |
Cauliflower |
Integrated Pest Management |
Installing Pheromone traps @ 25 nos./ha and alternate spraying of Neem oil 1500 ppm @ 2500 ml/ha at 25 DAT and Spinosad 45% SC @ 125ml/ha after 15 days
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
2 |
3 |
5 5 |
|
||||||
Details of farming situation
| Crop | Season | Farming situation (RF/Irrigated) | Soil type |
Status of soil (Kg/ha) |
Previous crop | Sowing date | Harvest date | Seasonal rainfall (mm) | No. of rainy days | ||
| N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||||
| Rice | Kharif | Rainfed medium | Red loam soil | 275 | 11.5 | 182.2 | 25.06.23 | 12.11.23 | 1056 | 74 | |
| Maize | Kharif | Rainfed upland | Red textured loam soil | ||||||||
| Brinjal | Kharif | Rain-fed/Irrigated upland | |||||||||
| Tomato | Rabi |
Irrigated medium land
|
|||||||||
| Cauliflower | Rabi | Irrigated medium land | |||||||||
In both the Tables, information of same crop should be provided. For example, if in Table 3.2A crops are mentioned as a,b,c,d etc., in the table for Details of farming situation, the same crop should be mentioned in the identical sequence.
| Crop | Thematic Area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % Increase | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
| Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Scented rice (cv. Kudrat 3) |
Integrated nutrient management | Application of 50% RDN (30 kg N/ha) through inorganic fertiliser + 50% RDN through organic sources [50% N through FYM + 25% through vermi-compost) + 25% through neem oil-cake] | 10 | 1.0 | 34.5 | 31.2 | 10.6 | 72350 | 115580 | 43230 | 1.60 | 64742 |
104870
|
40128 | 1.62 |
|
Maize (cv.VNR 4224)
|
Integrated weed management |
Post-emergence application of tembotrione 34.4% SC @ 100 ml/ha at 20 DAS (4-5 leaf stage) in maize
|
10 | 1.0 | 48.5 | 42.5 | 13.3 | 52030 | 101365 | 49335 | 1.95 | 56030 | 89452 | 33422 | 1.60 |
| Brinjal | Integrated Pest Management | Seed treatment with Metalaxyl MZ 72% WP @ 2gm/kg + soil application of Carbofuran @ 1kg a.i./ha + soil drenching with Carbendazim @ 0.15% + Streptocycline @ 0.015% at 30 and 45 days after transplanting | 10 | 1.0 | 196.4 | 286.8 | 45.8 | 262360 | 4.2 | 159680 | 3.1 | ||||
| Tomato | Integrated Pest Management | Removal of alternate host, growing of seedlings in protected structures, pruning & destruction of affected leaves from the beginning and alternate spraying of Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 2gm/lit & Spinosad 45% SC @ 1ml/ 3 lit of water at 10 days interval starting from initiation of the pest incidence | 10 | 1.0 |
298.2
|
267.8
|
11.4
|
1,28,980
|
2.62
|
1,01,065
|
2.31 | ||||
| Cauliflower | Integrated Pest Management | Installing Pheromone traps @ 25 nos./ha and alternate spraying of Neem oil 1500 ppm @ 2500 ml/ha at 25 DAT and Spinosad 45% SC @ 125ml/ha after 15 days | 10 | 1.0 |
177.92
|
280.32 | 57.55 |
1,98,960
|
3.5
|
1,03,460
|
2.4 | ||||
Livestock
| Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer | No. of units | Major parameters | % change in major parameter | Other parameter | *Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| Poultry | Livestock production and management |
Demonstration on quail farming under semi-intensive system (Demos : 10 nos., 50 birds/Unit)
|
10 | 10 |
Avg 5 week body weight (gms)- Male birds-194.6 gms, Female birds- 218.6 gms, Egg production in 9 weeks -630 nos/unit
|
– | 100% | – | – | 1115/- | 2460/- | 1345/- | 2.2 | – | – | – | – |
| Livestock production and management | Demonstration on probiotics supplementation on growth performance of chickens in semi-ntensive rearing system (Demo-5 , 40 birds/Unit ) | 05 | 05 |
Average body weight of birds at 12 week – 2.28±0.08
|
Average body weight of birds at 12 week 1.84±0.02 |
23.91%
|
– | – | 4232/- | 15,552/- | 10,684/- | 2.86 | 4100/- | 12,672/- | 7648/- | 2.36 | |
| Livestock production and management |
Demonstration on poultry breed Kalinga Pallishree in backyard. (New) (Demo -10, Area- 1.0 ha)
|
10 | 10 | Average body weight of birds at 12 week -2.35 Kg |
Average body weight of birds at 12 week – 1.85 Kg |
Continuing…. | |||||||||||
| Rabbitry | |||||||||||||||||
| Pigerry | |||||||||||||||||
| Sheep and goat | Livestock production and management |
Demonstration on deworming and supplement feeding on body weight gain of kids (Area- 30 kids)
|
05 | 05 |
Yield Avg. body weaning weight/kid (90 days) (kg)- 6.37
|
Yield Avg. body weaning weight/kid (90 days) (kg)-4.9
|
30% | – | – | 2064/- | 11083/- | 9020/- | 5.4 | 1600/- | 7105/- | 5505/- | 4.4 |
| Demonstration on deworming & supplement feeding on body weight gain of kids | 05 | 05 |
Yield Avg. body weaning weight/kid (90 days) (kg) -6.28±0.09
|
Yield Avg. body weaning weight/kid (90 days) (kg) -4.56±0.20
|
37.71%
|
– | – | 2454/- | 10,927/- | 8473/- | 4.4 | 2000/- | 7934/- | 5934/- | 3.9 | ||
| Duckery | |||||||||||||||||
| Others (pl.specify) | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | |||||||||||||||||
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Fisheries
| Category | Thematic area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer | No. of units | Major parameters | % change in major parameter | Other parameter | *Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
|||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
|||||||
| IMC Fingerlings | Production Management |
Demonstration on fingerling raising of in seasonal ponds
|
05 | 02 | Yield (fingerlings no. /ha.) = 98,000 / 2 crops/3 months | Yield (fingerlings no./ha.) = 42000 / 2 crops / 3 months | 133.33 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 14 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 09 |
80000 | 3,62,000 | 2,82,000 | 4.52 | 50000 | 1,68,000 | 1,18,000 | 3.36 | |
| Puntius gonionotus | Production Management |
Demonstration on stocking density of Puntius gonionotus (Java punti) in composite fish culture
|
05 | 05 | Cont.. |
Wt. of after 4 months (gm) = IMC (338 ) + Javapunti (220 ) = 658 gm |
Wt. after 4 months (gm) = Only IMC (364) gm |
Result awaited | ||||||||||
| Ornamental fishes | ||||||||||||||||||
| Others (pl. specify) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amur carp | Production Management | Demonstration on Replacement of slow-growing mrigal with Amur carp (Genetically improved common carp) in composite carp culture | 05 | 05 | Cont.. |
Wt. of after 4 months (gm) = 490 |
Wt. after 4 months (gm) = 325 |
Result awaited | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Other enterprises
| Category | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer | No. of units | Major parameters | % change in major parameter | Other parameter | *Economics of demonstration (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
*Economics of check (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
|||||
| Paddy straw mushroom |
Mushroom production by using paddy straw substrate (3 layers) with installation of fogger in mushroom production unit.
|
5 | 5 |
Yield(kg/bed)
1.02
|
Yield (kg/bed)
0.85 |
31 |
Biological efficiency
10.2
|
Biological efficiency
8.5 |
500 | 2040 | 1540 |
4.08
|
500 | 1700 | 1200 | 3 |
| Button mushroom | ||||||||||||||||
| Vermicompost |
Vermicompost production by using spent mushroom substrate Partial (decomposition for 30 days with cow dung in a ratio 60:40 by use of Eisenia foetida species of earthworm @2kg for 2qtl dry bio-waste and testing of primary nutrient content of compost) VERMI BED SIZE(12ftx4ftx2ft)
|
10 | 10 |
Yield(qtl/bed)
5.6 |
– |
100 |
N:P:K Analysis
N-1.5-2.1% P-1.0-1.5% K-0.6%
|
– | 3000 | 9600 | 6600 | 3.2 | – | – |
–
|
|
| Sericulture | ||||||||||||||||
| Apiculture | ||||||||||||||||
| Others (pl. specify) value addition | 10 | 10 |
Sensory evaluation
8.1 |
Sensory evaluation
7.2 |
10.8 |
Keeping quality
2 months |
Keeping quality
4 months |
250 Unit- (10 kg Noodles)
|
680 | 430 | 2.72 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 1.25 | |
2022
Cereals
|
Sl. No. |
Crop | Thematic area | Technology Demonstrated with detailed treatments | Area (ha) |
No. of farmers/ demonstration |
Reasons for shortfall in achievement | |||||||||
| Proposed | Actual | SC | ST | Others | Total | ||||||||||
| M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | T | |||||||
| 1. | Rice | Varietal evaluation |
Demonstration on medium duration HYV rice, Maudamani: CR Dhan 307
|
1.0 | 1.0 | 0- 0 0 – 0 | 10-0 | 10- 0 – 10 | No | ||||||
Details of farming situation
| Crop | Season | Farming situation (RF/Irrigated) | Soil type |
Status of soil (Kg/ha) |
Previous crop | Sowing date | Harvest date | Seasonal rainfall (mm) | No. of rainy days | ||
| N | P2O5 | K2O | |||||||||
| Rice | Kharif | Rainfed medium | Red loam soil | 285 | 10.5 | 178.2 | Rice | 28.06.22 | 14.11.22 | 1056 | 74 |
In both the Tables, information of same crop should be provided. For example, if in Table 3.2A crops are mentioned as a,b,c,d etc., in the table for Details of farming situation, the same crop should be mentioned in the identical sequence.
| Crop | Thematic Area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % Increase | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
| Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| 1 | Varietal evaluation |
Demonstration on medium duration HYV rice, Maudamani: CR Dhan 307
|
10 | 1.0 | 48.3 | 45.8 | 5.5 | 98572 | 62790 | 35782 | 1.57 | 62400 | 93432 | 31032 | 1.50 |
| Total | 10 | 1.0 | 48.3 | 45.8 | 5.5 | 98572 | 62790 | 35782 | 1.57 | 62400 | 93432 | 31032 | 1.50 | ||
Performance of FLD
Oilseeds:
Frontline demonstrations on oilseed crops
| Crop | Thematic Area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % Increase | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
| Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| 1 | Integrated nutrient management |
Demonstration of nutrient management in sunflower
|
10 | 1.0 | 15.6 | 12.8 | 21.9 | 61635 | 99904 | 38269 | 1.62 | 53885 | 81945 | 28060 | 1.52 |
| Total | 10 | 1.0 | 15.6 | 12.8 | 21.9 | 61635 | 99904 | 38269 | 1.62 | 53885 | 81945 | 28060 | 1.52 | ||
* Economics to be worked out based on total cost of production per unit area and not on critical inputs alone.
** BCR= GROSS RETURN/GROSS COST
Pulses
Frontline demonstration on pulse crops
| Crop | Thematic Area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmers |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % Increase | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
|||||||
| Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| 1 | Blackgram |
Demonstration of nutrient management in blackgram
|
10 | 1.0 | 6.47 | 4.86 | 33.1 | 30270 | 42675 | 12405 | 1.25 | 25810 | 32056 | 6246 | 1.25 |
| Total | 10 | 1.0 | 6.47 | 4.86 | 33.1 | 30270 | 42675 | 12405 | 1.25 | 25810 | 32056 | 6246 | 1.25 | ||
Other crops
|
Crop |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) |
% change in yield |
Other parameters |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demo |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Brinjal |
IDM |
Demonstration of Integrated management of wilt complex of Brinjal during Kharif |
5 |
2 |
296.5 |
223.8 |
32.48
|
% Disease Incidence
3.04 |
% Disease Incidence
14.12 |
82700 |
324544 |
241844 |
3.92 |
80500 |
268884 |
188384 |
3.34 |
|
Chilli |
IPM |
Demonstration on management of sucking pest complex in Chilli
|
5 |
2 |
103.04
|
81.9
|
25.81
|
No. of thrips/ twig- 11.4 |
No. of thrips/ twig- 24.7 |
70400 |
103040 |
32640 |
1.46 |
65600 |
81900 |
16300 |
1.24 |
|
No. of white-fly/ twig- 11.92 |
No. of white-fly/ twig- 25
|
||||||||||||||||
|
No. of aphids/ twig- 11.46 |
No. of aphids/ twig- 14.86 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Banana |
IDM |
Demonstration of IDM practice for management of Sigatoka disease in Banana |
5 |
2 |
383.42
|
288.94
|
32.69
|
% Disease Incidence 12.74
|
% Disease Incidence 23.7
|
145680 |
306736 |
161056 |
2.1 |
136510 |
231152 |
94642 |
1.69 |
|
Greengram |
IDM |
Demonstration on management of root rot in greengram |
5 |
2 |
7.3 |
5.86 |
24.57 |
% damage 11.16 |
% damage 22.28 |
26200 |
51100 |
24900 |
1.95 |
23400 |
41020 |
17620 |
1.75 |
|
Cashew apple |
IPM |
Demonstration on management of tea mosquito bug |
5 |
2 |
281.92 |
178.96 |
57.53 |
% Infestation 11.96 |
% Infestation 23.02 |
48200 |
140960 |
92760 |
2.94 |
45600 |
89480 |
43880 |
1.96 |
|
Chilli |
Production management |
Chilli seedlings (Arka Harita) are planted at a spacing of 90x60x45 cm in the paired row system, using ropes marked at 60 cm spacing |
5 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
43.5 cm |
25.8 cm |
1,24,900 |
|
|
|
1,02,500 |
|
|
|
|
Turmeric+mango |
Agroforestry management |
Small pits are made with a hand hoe on the beds with a spacing of 15 cm x 30 cm. Pits are filled with well decomposed cattle manure or compost, seed rhizomes are placed over it then covered with soil. The optimum spacing is 30 – 45 cm between the rows and 25 cm between the plants.
|
5 |
0.4 |
|
– |
|
64.5 cm |
|
1,28,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bamboo |
Production manage ment |
Culm cuttings are prepared during January to February and after 6 months it will be ready for plantation. Rotted culm cuttings are planted at 6 x 6 m during July to August following all the recommended cultural operations
|
5 |
|
Cont.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021
Other crops
| Crop | Thematic area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % change in yield | Other parameters | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check | Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| Cauliflower | IPM | Growing of mustard as trap crop 16; 1 ratio, 15days before transplanting of main crop + Ph. trap @ 25/ha and alternate spraying of Neem oil 5% and Spinosad 45SC @125ml/ha | 05 | 02 | 276.88 | 173.22 | 60% |
Insect pest incidence (%) – 7.9 |
Insect pest incidence (%) -21.52 | 54200 | 138440 | 84240 | 2.55 | 52400 | 86610 | 34210 | 1.65 |
| Cashew apple | IPM | Application of Lambda cyhalothrin 4.9CS @ 0.003% followed by profenophos @ 0.05% or vice versa at flushing and flowering stage | 05 | 02 | 3.94 | 2.66 | 48 |
Insect pest incidence (%) -12.56
No, of nymphs/m2- 11.98 |
Insect pest incidence (%) – 26.8
No, of nymphs/m2- 26.52 |
40000 | 157600 | 117600 | 3.94 | 32000 | 106400 | 74400 | 3.32 |
| Chilli | IPM | Soil application of neem cake @ 2.5q/ha, Installation of blue sticky traps @ 50 nos/ha and need based application of Diafenthiuron 50% WP @1gm/liter and Spiromesifen 240SC @ 0.6ml/liter alternately at 10days interval | 05 | 02 | 134.76 | 107.74 | 25 |
No. of aphids/twigs- 10.56
No. of jassids/twigs- 11.08
No. of white fly/twigs- 11.64
|
No. of aphids/twigs- 15.08
No. of jassids/twigs- 24.6
No. of white fly/twigs- 24.34 |
65200 | 134760 | 69560 | 2.06 | 63050 | 107740 | 44690 | 1.7 |
Livestock
| Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer | No.of units | Major parameters | % change in major parameter | Other parameter | *Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| Dairy | Feed & fodder technologies | Demonstration on Hybrid Napier (CO-4) fodder production for low cost milk production in dairy cows | 05 | 05 (20 cows) |
Average daily milk yield-5.3 lts
|
Average daily milk yield- 4.72 lt | 12.28% | – | – | 3280/- | 6360/- | 3080 | 1.9 | 3140/- | 5640/- | 2500/- | 1.7 |
| Cow | Disease management | Demonstration on teat dip formulations for prevention and control of mastitis in dairy cattle | 05 | 05 (16 cows) |
Average Milk Yield (lt/cow)-7.47 lts
|
Average Milk Yield (lt/cow)-6.57lts
|
13.69%
|
% of Occurrence of Sub-Clinical Mastitis-12.5% | % of Occurrence of Sub-Clinical Mastitis-50% | 26,980/- | 71,712/- | 44,732/ | 2.6 | 26,880/- | 63,072/- | 36,192/- | 2.3 |
| Poultry | Poultry Management | Demonstration on artificial brooding management in chicks | 05 | 05 (100 birds/unit) |
Average body weight at 16 weeks-1.94 kg
|
Average body weight at 16 weeks-1.76 kg
|
10.22%
|
Mortality %- 6%
|
Mortality%- 13% | 9025/- | 31001/- | 21,976/- | 3.4 | 8125/- | 26030/- | 17,905/- | 3.2 |
| Sheep and goat | Animal Nutrition Management | Demonstration on concentrate feeding in mother goats (Does) for reducing kid mortality | 05 | 05 (6 goats/unit) |
Weaning body weight of kids- 5.57 kg
|
Weaning body weight of kids- 4.28 kg
|
30.14%
|
Kid mortality % -Nil
|
Kid mortality %- 11.53%
|
18,180/- | 43,446/- | 25,266/- | 2.4 | 13,500/- | 29,532/- | 16032/- | 2.2 |
Fisheries
| Category | Thematic area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer | No. of units | Major parameters | % change in major parameter | Other parameter | *Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| IMC Fingerlings | Production Management |
Demonstration on fingerling raising of in seasonal ponds
|
05 | 05 | Yield (fingerlings no. /ha.) = 44,000 / 2 crops/3 months | Yield (fingerlings no./ha.) = 90000 / 2 crops / 3 months | 104.54 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 13 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 09 |
52000 | 3,60,000 | 3.08,000 | 4.19 | 42000 | 1,76,000 | 134000 | 6.92 |
2020
Other crops
| Crop | Thematic area | Name of the technology demonstrated | No. of Farmer |
Area (ha) |
Yield (q/ha) | % change in yield | Other parameters | *Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) |
*Economics of check (Rs./ha) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check | Demo | Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
| Okra | IPM | Demonstration of integrated management for sucking pests in okra | 5 | 2 | 110.66 | 81.86 | 26.02 |
No.of hoppers/ Plant-11.08 No.of whitefly/ Plant-11.64 |
No.of hoppers/ Plant-24.6 No.of whitefly/ Plant-24.34 |
73000 | 121726 | 48726 | 1.66 | 70000 | 90046 | 20046 | 1.28 |
| Litchi | IPM | Demonstration of Integrated management practices against Litchi Borer | 5 | 2 | 35.18 | 24.9 | 29.22 | %Damage-8.74 | %Damage-30.98 | 75000 | 457340 | 382340 | 6.09 | 65000 | 323700 | 258700 | 4.98 |
|
Cashew Apple |
IPM | Demonstration of Integrated management of Tea Mosquito Bug in Cashew Apple | 5 | 2 | 3.76 | 2.64 | 29.78 |
No.of nymphs/m2 11.5 %Damage-12.52 |
No.of nymphs/m2 26.56 %Damage- 26.62 |
40000 | 150400 | 110400 | 3.76 | 32000 | 105600 | 73600 | 3.3 |
| Brinjal | IDM | Demonstration of Integrated management of wilt complex of brinjal | 5 | 2 | 295.04 | 244.44 | 17.15 | %Damage-10.56 | %Damage-15.08 | 82700 | 324544 | 241844 | 3.92 | 80500 | 268884 | 188384 | 3.34 |
| Tomato | Varietal substitution | Demonstration of triple resistant (early blight, bacterial wilt, leaf curl virus) tomato var. ArkaRakhyak | 5 | 1 | 620.2 | 436.9 | 41 |
%Disease Affected- 6.5 |
%Disease Affected- 21.16 |
143520 | 465150 | 321630 | 3.24 | 138410 | 327675 | 189265 | 2.36 |
Livestock
|
Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No.of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Dairy |
Feeding management |
Demonstration on hydroponic maize fodder production for feeding in dairy farming |
5 |
5 |
Average daily mil yield-8.03±0.07 lts/ cow |
Average daily mil yield-7.46±0.08 lts/ cow |
7.64% |
GFY-8.5 kg/ 1kg of seed |
– |
3870 |
7227 |
3357 |
1.86 |
4200 |
6714 |
2514 |
1.59 |
|
Dairy |
Feeding management |
Demonstration on bypass fat feeding for increasing milk production in dairy cows |
5 |
5 |
Average daily milk yield-7.93±0.05 |
Average daily milk yield-7.08±0.01 |
12% |
Fat%-4.68%; SNF%-8.46% |
Fat%-4.27%; SNF-8.47% |
17302 |
32,116.5 |
14,814 |
1.85 |
15025 |
25,488 |
10,463 |
1.69 |
|
Poultry |
Poultry management |
Demonstration on improved backyard poultry breed Kadaknath |
10 |
10 |
Avg. body wt of cock at 10 months-1. 61kg Avg. body wt of hen at 10 month- 1.54g |
Avg. body wt of cock at 10 months-1.09 kg Avg. body wt of hen at 10 month- 0.97 kg |
Cock wt.-47.7% Hen wt-58.76% |
No. of eggs/4 months-25 nos |
No. of eggs/4 months-12 nos |
3950/unit |
11,475/unit |
7525/unit |
2.90 |
2800/unit |
4273.5/unit |
1474 |
1.53 |
Fisheries
|
Category |
Thematic area |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No.of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) |
*Economics of check (Rs.) |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
||||||
|
Common carps |
Production Management |
Demonstration on Replacement of slow-growing mrigal with Amur carp (Genetically improved common carp) in composite carp culture |
05 |
05 |
Yield (q/ha.) = 42.6 |
Yield (q/ha.) = 18.8 |
126.6 |
Wt. of after 6 months (gm) = 810 |
Wt. after 6 months (gm) = 385 |
92,800 |
5,96,400 |
5,03,600 |
6.43 |
80,400 |
2,63,200 |
1,82,800 |
3.27 |
|
IMC Fingerlings |
Production Management |
Demonstration on fingerling raising of in seasonal ponds |
05 |
05 |
Yield (fingerlings no. /ha.) = 84,000 / 2 crops/3 months |
Yield (fingerlings no./ha.) = 40000 / 2 crops / 3 months |
110 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 20 |
Wt. after 3 months (gm) = 03 |
39,009 |
2,52,000 |
2,12,991 |
6.46 |
31,496 |
1,20,000 |
88504 |
3.81 |
Other enterprises
|
Category |
Name of the technology demonstrated |
No. of Farmer |
No.of units |
Major parameters |
% change in major parameter |
Other parameter |
*Economics of demonstration (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
*Economics of check (Rs.) or Rs./unit |
||||||||
|
Demons ration |
Check |
Demons ration |
Check |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
Gross Cost |
Gross Return |
Net Return |
** BCR |
|||||
|
Drudgery reduction |
Akola dal mill Field capacity: 100kg / hr, 3hp single phase |
10 |
1 |
Field capacity 4.5 qtl/day |
Field capacity 18.5 kg/day |
|
Broken % 4-5 |
Broken % 18-20 |
300 |
2250 |
1950 |
7.5 |
1500 |
2250 |
750 |
1.5 |
|
Drudgery Reduction |
Drudgery Reduction for picking of mango from Orchard by Fruit Harvester (CAET, Dapoli) |
5 |
5 |
Output (kg/hr): 41 |
Output (kg/hr): 25 |
Increase in harvesting efficiency (%): 89 |
Average working heart rate(beat/min): 101 |
Average working heart rate(beat/min): 121 |
Saving in working heart rate in %: 16.5 |
Energy expenditure(kj/min) Demonstration: 7.33 |
Energy expenditure(kj/min) Check: 10.52 |
Saving in energy expenditure in %: 30.32 |
|
Labourmandays(100 tree): 7 |
Labourmandays(100 tree): 3 |
Saving labor (rs): 1200 |
|
Nutritional security |
Nutritional garden for Improving Nutritional Security of farm family (OUAT-2008 |
10 |
10 |
Consumption of vegetables/ day/ Family (gm) 585gm/ day |
Consumption of vegetables/ day/ Family (gm) 240gm/ day |
Increase in consumption of Vegetables as compared to RDA (%) 48.75 |
Avg Yield (qtl)/ unit 1.9 |
Avg Yield (qtl)/ unit 1.2 |
650 |
1830 |
1180 |
2.81 |
650 |
920 |
270 |
1.41 |